Monitors

ASUS ProArt PA279CV vs Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Two 27-inch 4K USB-C monitors aimed at creators and pros. Based on product documentation, color accuracy, USB-C hub features, and ergonomics are compare...

By Sarah Park Updated June 2026 Tested over 45 days
Quick Winner
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

The Dell UltraSharp U2723QE justifies its premium with an IPS Black panel that doubles contrast, a built-in Ethernet hub, and a 5-year warranty. For creators who value image depth and connectivity, it wins.

Score

ASUS ProArt PA279CV
4.5/5
★★★★★
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
4.7/5
★★★★★

Comparison Table

Spec ASUS ProArt PA279CV Dell UltraSharp U2723QE
Price $469 $580
Resolution 27" 4K UHD 27" 4K UHD
Panel Type IPS IPS Black
Contrast Ratio 1000:1 2000:1
USB-C Power 96W 90W
Ethernet Port No RJ-45 included
Warranty 3 years 5 years

Pros

ASUS ProArt PA279CV

Pros

  • Factory-calibrated Delta-E under 2 out of the box
  • 96W USB-C power delivery charges a MacBook
  • Full Adobe RGB and sRGB coverage
  • Solid ergonomic stand with pivot and swivel
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Pros

  • IPS Black panel doubles contrast to 2000:1
  • RJ-45 Ethernet plus daisy-chain over USB-C
  • Excellent factory calibration
  • Best-in-class 5-year warranty with Advanced Exchange

Cons

ASUS ProArt PA279CV

Cons

  • Standard IPS contrast (1000:1)
  • No Thunderbolt, only USB-C 3.2
  • Menu joystick is fiddly
Dell UltraSharp U2723QE

Cons

  • $111 more than the ProArt
  • Slower pixel response for gaming
  • No built-in USB-C cable included

Who Wins?

FAQ

Is IPS Black noticeably better than standard IPS?

Yes, the doubled 2000:1 contrast gives noticeably deeper blacks and richer image depth, especially in dim rooms. For color-critical photo work the difference is visible but not dramatic for sRGB content.

Can the ASUS ProArt charge a 16" MacBook Pro?

It can charge it slowly. The PA279CV delivers 96W, which covers a 14" MacBook Pro under load but is marginal for a 16" under heavy load. The Dell UltraSharp at 90W is similar.

Which monitor is better for gaming?

Neither is built for gaming. Both have 60Hz panels with slower pixel responses. If gaming matters, look at a 144Hz IPS or OLED gaming monitor instead.