TinyPNG vs Squoosh
TinyPNG vs Squoosh compared on product documentation: batch compression versus fine control, $25/yr versus free, and which formats each supports.
The Story at a Glance
-
TinyPNG
Best for batch
-
Squoosh
Best for control
-
Price
TinyPNG: $25/yr · Squoosh: Free
-
Features
Squoosh has more formats, TinyPNG is faster
-
Our Pick
TinyPNG for batch, Squoosh for control
Key Facts
TinyPNG and Squoosh both shrink images for the web, but they take different positions on the control-versus-convenience spectrum: TinyPNG is a one-click batch compressor, while Squoosh is a precision instrument with visual comparison. Price is the other cleaved line — $25 yearly versus entirely free.
TinyPNG wins the batch workflow. Drop up to 20 images at once (more with a Pro account), and it returns compressed files in seconds — typically 60 to 70% smaller with imperceptible quality loss on photographs. Its smart lossy compression quantizes PNG colors and optimizes JPEGs with tuned defaults, requiring zero parameter knowledge. The WordPress plugin and developer API make it a pipeline component for sites processing many images. The tradeoff: limited format support (PNG, JPEG, WebP) and no per-image tuning — you get their settings or nothing, and files are uploaded to their servers.
Squoosh wins on control and privacy. It runs entirely in your browser — images never leave your machine, which matters for sensitive or client work. Its format support is broad: WebP, AVIF, MozJPEG, PNG, and more, each with adjustable quality, resize, and palette settings. The split-view slider shows compressed versus original side by side, letting you find the exact quality floor for each image. The costs: one image at a time, and meaningful settings decisions — MozJPEG quality, WebP effort levels — require understanding that TinyPNG users never need.
Practical guidance: website owners processing batches of photos want TinyPNG — speed and simplicity justify the small fee, and the API automates it. Developers optimizing hero images, designers doing client work with confidentiality requirements, or anyone needing modern formats like AVIF wants Squoosh's precision and local processing. Many workflows use both: Squoosh to establish the right format and settings for key images, TinyPNG for the bulk.