Modelflare Review: AI API Gateway for GPT, Claude, Grok & More
Modelflare is a hosted AI API gateway: one API key and one OpenAI-compatible endpoint that routes to GPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, and other model families, with price-tiered routing groups, ordered fallback, and per-request cost tracking. In this review we break down what it actually does, how to wire it into existing apps and coding agents like Codex and Claude Code, what it really costs, where it beats OpenRouter/LiteLLM/Portkey, and where it falls short.
Quick Verdict
Modelflare is a hosted multi-provider gateway best suited to developers who are already juggling several AI vendor accounts and want one key, one bill, and one log stream instead of five. Its strongest points are the OpenAI-compatible API (plus native Anthropic and Gemini protocols), transparent price-tiered routing groups that list per-token prices against official rates, ordered fallback between model groups, and first-class setup docs for Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and OpenCode.
The honest limits: the catalog is small (25 models at the time of writing) compared with OpenRouter; the operator, Havenbyte LLC, is a young company with no SOC 2 or ISO certifications claimed; the cheapest routing tier is explicitly positioned for retryable workloads rather than production traffic; subscription credits only apply to GPT, Claude, and Gemini and do not roll over; and there is no self-hosted option. If you need a large model marketplace, compliance certifications, or full infrastructure control, look elsewhere. If you want a simple, low-friction gateway with visible per-request costs, Modelflare is worth a look.
Try Modelflare yourself
Create an account, generate an API key, and point an existing OpenAI-compatible client at it — the whole setup takes minutes.
Create your Modelflare accountPartner link — ToolStep may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you.
What Is Modelflare?
Modelflare, operated by Havenbyte LLC, sits between your application and the AI providers. Instead of managing an OpenAI key, an Anthropic key, an xAI key, and a Google key separately, your app talks to Modelflare using one key, and Modelflare forwards each request to the selected model or model group. It speaks the protocols your tools already use: OpenAI Chat Completions and the Responses API at https://modelflare.dev/v1, and the native Anthropic Messages and Gemini protocols at https://modelflare.dev.
That last mile matters for developer tools. Because Modelflare implements the OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini wire protocols, tools that let you override a base URL — Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, CC-Switch, Grok Build — can be pointed at Modelflare without code changes. We cover those setups below.
What Problem Does Modelflare Solve?
If you build with more than one model provider, the pain is familiar:
- Key sprawl. Separate API keys, billing dashboards, and rate limits for OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, and Google. Modelflare collapses them into one key and one balance.
- Vendor lock-in in the small. Hard-coding provider SDKs makes switching models a refactor. A gateway turns "switch model" into "change a model string."
- Provider outages. When a single provider has a bad hour, your product has a bad hour. Ordered fallback between model groups lets requests reroute automatically.
- Cost blindness. Official consoles show spend per vendor, not per feature, per API key, or per agent. Modelflare logs model, tokens, status, latency, and cost for every request in one place.
- Agent wiring overhead. Every CLI agent has its own config format. Modelflare ships per-tool setup guides and installers so each tool gets its own key against a shared balance.
These are the same problems the broader "AI gateway" category addresses — see our reviews of the tools that sit on top of this layer, like Claude Code vs Cursor, for where gateways fit in a modern AI dev stack.
Key Modelflare Features
Based on Modelflare's official site, docs, and trust pages as of August 28, 2026:
- Multi-model access. 25 enabled models across OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Google, DeepSeek, Moonshot (Kimi), and Alibaba (Qwen) — plus image generation (GPT Image 2) and video (Seedance 2.5) endpoints.
- OpenAI-compatible API. Chat Completions and Responses API at
https://modelflare.dev/v1; native Anthropic Messages and Gemini protocols athttps://modelflare.dev. - Model groups. Named routing groups per model at different price/stability tiers (e.g.
openai-award,openai-stable,openai-premium), selected per API key or per tool config. - Ordered fallback. Priority-ordered fallback groups in the dashboard; requests switch automatically when the primary group is unavailable.
- Per-key access control. Create separate API keys per app, tool, or agent, each with its own group assignment.
- Request logs. Status, latency, token usage, and cost per request, in real time.
- Cache Hit Guarantee. Eligible requests get daily cache hit-rate protection, with shortfalls compensated — verifiable in the usage dashboard.
- Broad regional availability. Commercial API access across 150+ listed countries and regions (effective August 1, 2026).
- Documented data handling. Request/response content is not stored as a standard long-term record; diagnostics expire after 72 hours; the optional Request Archive is off by default with a 168-hour expiry.
OpenAI-Compatible API: Three Values and You're Done
The core integration contract is deliberately boring, which is a compliment. Any client that already speaks the OpenAI API only needs three values changed:
That's the entire migration story for OpenAI-SDK-based apps. Because Anthropic Messages and Gemini native protocols are also supported at the root base URL, tools that speak those protocols natively (like Claude Code and Gemini CLI) work without an OpenAI shim. Model IDs are Modelflare-specific — you pick them from the live catalog, and per-model support differs: some models are available via Chat Completions only, others also via the Responses API, Anthropic Messages, or Gemini native calls.
How to Connect an Existing Application
The docs describe a three-step path: create an API key, set the base URL, send the first request. In practice, for an app already using the OpenAI SDK:
- Create an API key in the Modelflare dashboard — one key per app, tool, or agent, each mapped to a routing group.
- Set the base URL to
https://modelflare.dev/v1and the key in your client's auth header. - Set the model to a catalog ID such as
gpt-5.6-sol(optionally pin a routing group likeopenai-stablewhere the tool supports it). - Send a request and verify the response, then check usage — tokens, status, latency, and cost appear in the dashboard.
A minimal Chat Completions request looks like this:
cURL
curl https://modelflare.dev/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_MODELFLARE_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "gpt-5.6-sol",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Hello" }]
}' Note: exact model IDs, supported protocols, and routing-group availability vary per model and change over time — always cross-check the live catalog and docs before hard-coding values. We verified the examples above against Modelflare's published quick-start documentation on August 28, 2026.
Using Modelflare With Developer Tools
This is where Modelflare's integration work pays off. It publishes dedicated quick starts for Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, CC-Switch, and Grok Build. The three most search-relevant setups:
Modelflare with Codex
Codex talks to OpenAI-compatible providers, so Modelflare provides a one-line installer (curl -fsSL https://modelflare.dev/install/codex.sh | sh, with PowerShell and root/container variants) that writes a Modelflare provider into ~/.codex/config.toml. Manual setup is equally short:
~/.codex/config.toml
# ~/.codex/config.toml
model_provider = "modelflare"
model = "gpt-5.6-sol"
model_routing_group = "openai-stable" Launch with codex --model gpt-5.6-sol. Two things worth knowing: the routing group is set in the config (e.g. openai-stable), and the docs' troubleshooting table flags that a model_not_found error usually means the API key's group can't access that model — a reminder that key, group, and model must line up. For background on the tool itself, see our Best AI Coding Assistant 2026 guide.
Modelflare with Claude Code
Claude Code speaks the Anthropic Messages protocol natively, so the integration is an environment override rather than a provider plugin. Modelflare again offers an installer, or the manual route — set the base URL and key in Claude Code's settings:
settings.json
// Claude Code settings.json
{
"env": {
"ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL": "https://modelflare.dev",
"ANTHROPIC_API_KEY": "YOUR_MODELFLARE_API_KEY"
}
} At the time of writing, the documented supported models are claude-opus-4-8 and claude-sonnet-5 — a narrower Claude selection than the full catalog, so check the quick start before assuming a specific Claude model works. Context on the tool: our Claude Code vs Cursor and Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot comparisons cover where it fits.
Modelflare with Gemini CLI and OpenCode
Gemini CLI uses two environment variables: GEMINI_API_KEY (your Modelflare key) and GOOGLE_GEMINI_BASE_URL=https://modelflare.dev, since it speaks the Gemini native protocol. OpenCode uses the OpenAI-compatible https://modelflare.dev/v1 endpoint with models like gpt-5.6-sol. Modelflare also documents CC-Switch (a provider switcher for Claude Code-style tools) and Grok Build setups, though we'd only add those if they match your stack.
Point your coding agents at one gateway
Give Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI each their own Modelflare key — one balance, one cost log.
Get started with ModelflarePartner link — ToolStep may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you.
Model Groups & Ordered Fallback
Two mechanisms do the heavy lifting in Modelflare's routing story.
Model groups are named routes per model at different price and stability tiers. For gpt-5.6-sol, the catalog lists openai-award (price-priority, for retryable workloads), openai-stable (the go-to for everyday development), and openai-premium (billed higher, prioritizing continuity and request success). You select a group per API key or per tool config — which means, for example, your CI test suite can use the cheap retryable route while your production key uses the stable one.
Ordered fallback is configured in the dashboard: you add fallback groups in priority order, and when the primary group is unavailable, requests switch automatically to the next one. Be precise about what this is: it is availability-based rerouting between groups, not a semantic quality router. Modelflare's own copy says requests switch "when the primary group is unavailable" — the mechanism does not evaluate which model would answer best, and a fallback group may route to a different model or provider entirely, which can change output characteristics mid-outage.
Usage, Tokens & Cost Tracking
Every request that passes through Modelflare is logged with its model, routing, status, latency, token counts, cache usage, and cost. Because each API key is a separate entity — one per app, tool, or agent — the dashboard effectively becomes a per-key cost breakdown without any instrumentation code on your side.
That is the quiet killer feature for anyone running AI features in production. "What did the onboarding assistant cost last week?" or "which agent burned the tokens?" becomes a dashboard filter instead of a logging pipeline you have to build and maintain. The trust documentation also states what is not retained: request/response content is not stored as a standard long-term record, short-term diagnostics expire after 72 hours, and the optional Request Archive is off by default with a 168-hour expiry.
Pricing
Checked against Modelflare's live pricing page on August 28, 2026. The catalog showed 25 enabled models. Prices change — treat this section as a snapshot, not a quote.
Modelflare prices per model and per routing group, in multipliers of the official API list price. The clearest documented example is gpt-5.6-sol (official list: $5 input / $30 output per million tokens):
| Routing group | Multiplier | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Positioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
openai-first-topup | 0.015× | $0.075 | $0.45 | Limited-time rate, unlocked by a single US$20 top-up |
openai-award | 0.03× | $0.15 | $0.90 | Price-priority, for retryable dev/test workloads |
openai-stable | 0.08× | $0.40 | $2.40 | Everyday development, stability-priority |
openai-premium | 0.13× | $0.65 | $3.90 | Continuity and request-success priority |
| Official API (reference) | 1.0× | $5.00 | $30.00 | OpenAI list price |
Other models follow the same group structure (Claude and several GPT models listed with 3-4 routing groups; Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi, and Qwen models with one group each at the time of checking). Beyond pay-per-token, Modelflare sells prepaid subscription plans that add bonus credits:
| Plan price | Credits | Bonus | Distribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| US$99.99 | $110.00 | +10% | 4 installments, every 7 days |
| US$299.99 | $340.00 | +13% | 4 installments, every 7 days |
| US$499.99 | $580.00 | +16% | 4 installments, every 7 days |
| US$999.99 | $1,180.00 | +18% | 4 installments, every 7 days |
| US$1,499.99 | $1,800.00 | +20% | 4 installments, every 7 days |
Read the fine print on subscriptions: credits apply only to OpenAI GPT, Claude, and Gemini models (other models draw on remaining credit); unused credits do not roll over; and the bonus percentages are tied to the plan tier. Whether the effective rate is "cheaper" depends entirely on your routing-group mix — the premium tier bills at 13% of list for gpt-5.6-sol, while the retryable award tier bills at 3%. We're deliberately not claiming across-the-board savings: rates, group availability, and offers (like the limited-time first-top-up multiplier) can change at any time.
For context on the models you'd be routing to, see our GPT-5.6 vs Claude comparison, the Grok 4.6 review, and the Gemini 3.7 Flash review.
Modelflare vs Alternatives
Three alternatives cover most of the same ground. Which one fits depends on whether you want a hosted discount gateway, self-hosted control, or observability depth.
| Modelflare | OpenRouter | LiteLLM | Portkey | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hosted gateway | Hosted marketplace | Open-source proxy (+ cloud) | Gateway + observability |
| Unified API | OpenAI-compatible + native Anthropic/Gemini | OpenAI-compatible | OpenAI-compatible (100+ providers) | OpenAI-compatible |
| Catalog size | 25 models (Aug 2026) | Hundreds of models | Depends on your provider keys | Depends on your provider keys |
| Fallback / routing | Ordered group fallback, price-tiered groups | Provider routing + fallback | Routing, fallback, budgets | Routing, fallback, guardrails |
| Cost tracking | Per-request logs incl. cost, cache guarantee | Per-request usage + spend | Per-key/team budgets | Deep observability suite |
| Self-hosted | No | No | Yes (open source) | Partially (open-source gateway) |
| Pricing model | Per token by group; prepaid plans with bonus | Per token + fee on credit purchases | Free self-host; paid cloud | Usage-based tiers |
| Best for | Devs wanting one cheap key for top models + agent tooling | Maximum model choice in one account | Teams that must own the infra | Production teams needing observability |
- Modelflare vs OpenRouter: OpenRouter's catalog is far larger and it is the safer "default" choice for model variety. Modelflare's edge is price-tiered routing with published multipliers, native Anthropic/Gemini protocol support (so Claude Code and Gemini CLI connect natively), and per-tool integration guides. If you need obscure or niche models, OpenRouter wins; if you want cheaper access to the current flagship cohort with fallback, Modelflare is more focused.
- Modelflare vs LiteLLM: LiteLLM is the choice when self-hosting is non-negotiable — you keep your provider keys, data never leaves your infra, and the proxy is free. You pay for that with setup and maintenance burden, and usage dashboards you assemble yourself. Modelflare trades that control for a managed service; whether that trade is acceptable is a trust decision, not a technical one.
- Modelflare vs Portkey: Portkey leans into production observability — tracing, guardrails, caching, evaluations — with a hosted platform and an open-source gateway. Modelflare's logging is simpler: per-request status, latency, tokens, and cost. If you need deep tracing across complex agent pipelines, Portkey is the stronger observability layer; if you mainly need cost visibility and cheaper tokens, Modelflare covers it with less surface area.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- One API key and balance across GPT, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi, and Qwen models
- OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions/Responses plus native Anthropic Messages and Gemini protocols — most tools connect without code changes
- Transparent price-tiered routing groups with per-token prices published against official rates
- Ordered fallback between model groups for availability rerouting
- Per-request usage, token, status, latency, and cost logs; separate keys per app or agent
- Cache Hit Guarantee with shortfall compensation, verifiable in the dashboard
- First-class quick starts for Codex, Claude Code, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, CC-Switch, and Grok Build
- Documented data-handling policy: no long-term storage of request content, 72-hour diagnostics expiry, Request Archive off by default
Cons
- Small catalog — 25 models versus hundreds on OpenRouter
- Operated by a young company (Havenbyte LLC); no SOC 2 or ISO certifications claimed at the time of writing
- Cheapest routing tier (award) is positioned for retryable workloads, not production traffic — the price/reliability trade-off is real
- Subscription credits apply only to GPT, Claude, and Gemini, and unused credits do not roll over
- No self-hosted option — all traffic and prompts pass through a third party
- Fallback is availability-based rerouting, not semantic model selection; behavior can differ across fallback groups
- Pricing, group availability, and promotional rates can change; the published multipliers are a snapshot, not a contract
Who Should Use Modelflare?
Multi-model app and agent developers
If your product calls more than one provider — or you want the option to — one key, one bill, and per-key cost attribution remove real operational friction. The OpenAI-compatible surface means an existing OpenAI SDK app migrates in minutes.
Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI power users
Running several subscription-based coding agents gets expensive and fragmented. Routing them through one gateway with per-tool keys and a shared usage log is a genuinely better billing and monitoring setup — and the per-tool installers make it low-effort.
Indie builders and small AI SaaS teams
For teams without platform engineers, the hosted fallback, cost dashboards, and cache hit-rate guarantee replace infrastructure you would otherwise build — provided you're comfortable with the third-party-routing trust trade.
Cost-sensitive development and CI workloads
The award group's positioning — cheap, retryable, for dev/test traffic — is exactly the profile of automated pipelines where a retried request costs less than a premium route.
Who May Not Need Modelflare?
- Single-provider projects. If your app only calls one official API and you're happy with its console, a gateway adds a hop, a third party, and a billing layer without solving a problem you have.
- Compliance-constrained teams. No SOC 2 or ISO claims at the time of writing, and prompts transit a third party — regulated workloads may require certifications Modelflare doesn't yet advertise.
- Self-hosted requirements. If policy or paranoia says keys and traffic must stay on your infra, LiteLLM is the honest answer; Modelflare has no self-hosted option.
- Provider-specific feature depth. If you depend on provider-native features beyond the supported protocol surface (specific fine-tunes, org-level endpoints, or the newest model on day one), a gateway — any gateway — will lag the official API.
- Long-tail model hunters. 25 models covers the flagship cohort but not the long tail; OpenRouter's catalog is much larger.
FAQ
What is Modelflare?
Modelflare is a hosted AI API gateway operated by Havenbyte LLC. It gives you a single API key and endpoint for models from OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI, Google, DeepSeek, Moonshot, Alibaba, and other providers, using OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions and Responses APIs plus native Anthropic Messages and Gemini protocols. It also provides routing groups at different price and stability tiers, ordered fallback between model groups, and per-request usage and cost logs.
Is Modelflare compatible with OpenAI APIs?
Yes. Modelflare exposes OpenAI-compatible Chat Completions and Responses API endpoints at the base URL https://modelflare.dev/v1. In an existing OpenAI SDK or client, you swap the API key and base URL and use a Modelflare model ID; request and response formats follow the OpenAI conventions. Modelflare also supports the native Anthropic Messages and Gemini protocols through the base URL https://modelflare.dev.
How much does Modelflare cost?
Modelflare charges per token based on the routing group you select. For gpt-5.6-sol (official list price $5 input / $30 output per million tokens), the openai-award group costs $0.15/$0.90, openai-stable $0.40/$2.40, and openai-premium $0.65/$3.90 per million tokens, as of August 28, 2026. Prepaid subscription plans from US$99.99 add 10-20% bonus credits. Prices change over time, so check the official pricing page before committing.
What models does Modelflare support?
As of August 28, 2026, the catalog lists 25 enabled models, including OpenAI gpt-5.6-sol, gpt-5.6-terra, gpt-5.5, and gpt-5.4; Anthropic claude-opus-5, claude-sonnet-5, claude-opus-4-8, claude-haiku-4-5, and claude-fable-5; xAI grok-4.6 and grok-4.5; Google Gemini 3.7/3.6/3.5 Flash and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview; DeepSeek V4 Pro and Flash; Kimi K3; and Qwen3.8-Max, plus image generation (gpt-image-2) and video (Seedance 2.5) endpoints.
Can I use Modelflare with Codex?
Yes. Modelflare publishes a Codex quick start with a one-line installer and a manual setup. In ~/.codex/config.toml you set model_provider to modelflare, choose a model such as gpt-5.6-sol, and optionally set a model_routing_group such as openai-stable. You then store your Modelflare API key and launch Codex with codex --model gpt-5.6-sol.
Can I use Modelflare with Claude Code?
Yes. Modelflare provides an installer or a manual configuration for Claude Code. In the Claude Code settings.json you set ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL to https://modelflare.dev and ANTHROPIC_API_KEY to your Modelflare API key. The documented supported models at the time of writing are claude-opus-4-8 and claude-sonnet-5.
How does Modelflare fallback work?
In the Modelflare dashboard you add fallback model groups in priority order. When the primary group is unavailable, requests switch automatically to the next group in the list instead of failing. This is group-level availability routing: it is not a semantic quality router, and it does not guarantee a specific model will always serve the request, since fallback groups may route to different models or providers.
Is Modelflare cheaper than official APIs?
For the models and routing groups we checked on August 28, 2026, list prices are below the official per-token rates: gpt-5.6-sol via the openai-stable group is billed at $0.40/$2.40 per million tokens versus the official $5/$30. However, pricing is route-dependent, discount routes trade reliability, subscription credits apply only to GPT, Claude, and Gemini models, and unused credits do not roll over. Verify current rates on the official pricing page before committing.
What are the alternatives to Modelflare?
The closest alternatives are OpenRouter (a hosted model marketplace with a unified OpenAI-compatible API and a much larger catalog), LiteLLM (an open-source gateway you can self-host with support for 100+ providers), and Portkey (a gateway focused on observability, guardrails, and caching, available hosted or self-hosted). The right choice depends on whether you want a hosted discount gateway, self-hosted control, or deeper observability.
Final Verdict
Modelflare is worth using if you're a multi-model developer or coding-agent power user who wants one key, one bill, and per-request cost visibility at below-official list rates — and you're comfortable routing through a young third-party operator. The OpenAI/Anthropic/Gemini protocol coverage is genuinely useful, the per-tool setup guides for Codex and Claude Code are better than most gateways bother with, and the price-tiered routing model is unusually transparent about what you're buying: cheap-and-retryable versus stable-versus-premium.
It is not worth using if you need a large model catalog (OpenRouter), certifications or self-hosting (LiteLLM or an official API), or deep production observability (Portkey). The 25-model catalog, absent compliance claims, and no-rollover subscription credits are real constraints, not nitpicks.
Our suggestion for the right developer: start with one low-stakes workload — point your dev-tier Codex key or a side project at the stable group, watch the usage dashboard for a week, and check whether the cost and log visibility actually change how you work. If they do, move more keys over. If reliability or support disappoints, you've risked very little finding out.
Ready to try Modelflare?
Create your account, explore the model catalog and routing groups, and connect your first tool in minutes.
Create your Modelflare accountPartner link — ToolStep may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you.
Our Editorial Standards
Affiliate Disclosure
ToolStep is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no extra cost to you. We participate in affiliate programs with Amazon, Best Buy, Walmart, and select brand partners. These commissions help us fund our independent editorial research and keep our reviews free for readers.
Our affiliate relationships never influence our ratings or recommendations. Products are ranked based solely on evaluation results, build quality, and value — not on commission rates. If a product scores poorly, we say so regardless of whether we earn a commission on it.
Editorial Policy
Every review published on ToolStep follows a strict editorial process:
- No sponsored reviews. We do not accept payment in exchange for positive coverage. Brands cannot pay for a higher rating or for us to omit criticism.
- Independent purchasing. Unless explicitly stated, we purchase review units at retail price. When a brand provides a loaner unit, we disclose it at the top of the review and return the product after testing.
- No AI-written content. Every review is created through editorial research and product analysis. We use AI tools for research assistance only, never for generating review conclusions or ratings.
- Transparent updates. When a product is updated or recalled, we re-test and update our review with the date of the change clearly marked.
- Conflict of interest. Reviewers are prohibited from holding stock or financial positions in companies whose products they review.
Testing Methodology
Our reviews evaluate products using publicly available specifications, manufacturer information, feature analysis, pricing comparison, and practical workflow considerations. The general process:
- Product documentation review: We analyze official manufacturer specs, product documentation, and published technical information.
- Feature evaluation: We assess features against the product's intended use case and target workflow.
- Pricing comparison: We compare the product against at least two direct competitors in the same price tier.
- Workflow assessment: We evaluate how the product fits into real-world home office and professional workflows based on published capabilities.
- Published information synthesis: We aggregate publicly available information including manufacturer specs, changelogs, and public documentation to form our assessment.
- Reader feedback integration: We monitor reader comments and warranty claim patterns. If a product shows widespread failure, we update our recommendation.