The 10 best Dell U2723QE alternatives in 2026, ranked by 4K, USB-C, and color accuracy for productivity and programming workflows.
By Marcus ChenUpdated Spec observations reflect product documentation as of June 2026.
10
Alternatives
Docs
Analysis
5
FAQs
Based on product documentation, 10 Dell U2723QE alternatives are compared, evaluating panel type, USB-C power delivery, color accuracy, and price. The U2723QE is a strong 4K USB-C monitor but some users want higher refresh rate, OLED contrast, or a lower price.
Decision Summary
The Dell U2723QE is a strong 4K USB-C monitor; users leave for gaming refresh rates, better HDR, or lower price. Switch when refresh, HDR, or budget matters more than its office-oriented strengths.
Why Switch Away From Dell U2723QE
60Hz limits gaming and scrolling smoothness
HDR is modest
Premium price for an office panel
How Each Alternative Changes the Trade-off
Use case
Dell U2723QE: The U2723QE excels at office work, text, and USB-C docking.
Alternative: Gaming and HDR needs point to high-refresh or OLED panels.
When this matters: Decides it by what the monitor is for.
Connectivity
Dell U2723QE: Its USB-C hub with power delivery is a desk-cable solution.
Alternative: Rivals vary in hub capability.
When this matters: Keeps the U2723QE for single-cable laptop setups.
Price
Dell U2723QE: The U2723QE commands a premium.
Alternative: Comparable 4K panels cost less without the Dell extras.
When this matters: Matters for budget buyers.
Best For / Not For
Switch If
Users who need refresh rates, HDR, or lower prices than the U2723QE offers.
Stay With Dell U2723QE If
Office workers who value its USB-C hub and text clarity.
What Switching Costs
None — swap the display.
Real-World Switching Scenarios
Gamer needing higher refresh — Mixed work-and-play users120Hz+ panels serve both work and gaming.
Single-cable laptop worker — Office and dev usersStaying preserves the USB-C hub convenience.
HDR enthusiast — Media viewersOLED and HDR panels beat the U2723QE's modest HDR.
How This Was Researched
This guide is based on a structured review of official product documentation, published feature lists, current pricing, and community-reported limitations — the same methodology ToolStep describes on the /how-we-test/ page. We do not claim hands-on testing that did not happen.
Spec observations reflect product documentation as of June 2026.
Alternatives Table
#
Alternative
Best For
Rating
Pricing
1
LG UltraFine 4K (24MD4KL)
Mac-native 4K
★★★★★4.5/5
$699
2
ASUS ProArt PA279CV
Calibrated productivity
★★★★★4.5/5
$549
3
LG C2 OLED 42"
OLED hybrid
★★★★★4.8/5
$999
4
BenQ PD2705U
Designer 4K
★★★★☆4.4/5
$699
5
Apple Studio Display
Mac purist 5K
★★★★★4.5/5
$1599
6
Dell U2724DE
Refresh rate upgrade
★★★★★4.5/5
$799
7
ASUS ProArt PA278CV
Budget QHD USB-C
★★★★☆4.3/5
$329
8
Gigabyte M27U
Gaming + productivity 4K
★★★★★4.5/5
$599
9
Dell U2722D
QHD value
★★★★☆4.3/5
$549
10
Samsung M8
Smart monitor
★★★★☆4.2/5
$699
Pros & Cons by Alternative
1
LG UltraFine 4K (24MD4KL)
Best for: Mac-native 4K
Pros
Perfect Mac integration
USB-C 60W
P3 wide color
Reliable with macOS
Cons
Only 24 inches
No RJ45
$200 more
2
ASUS ProArt PA279CV
Best for: Calibrated productivity
Pros
4K IPS
USB-C 65W
Factory calibrated
$150 cheaper
Cons
Standard IPS contrast
60 Hz
No RJ45
3
LG C2 OLED 42"
Best for: OLED hybrid
Pros
Infinite contrast
120 Hz refresh
Large 42-inch panel
Dolby Vision
Cons
$200 more
No USB-C
Burn-in risk
WRGB subpixel softens text
4
BenQ PD2705U
Best for: Designer 4K
Pros
4K IPS
USB-C 65W
Hotkey Puck G2
M-Book mode for Mac
Cons
$100 more
60 Hz
Standard IPS contrast
5
Apple Studio Display
Best for: Mac purist 5K
Pros
5K resolution
True Tone
Excellent macOS scaling
Spatial audio
Cons
No USB-C power to Mac
Only 60 Hz
Premium price
6
Dell U2724DE
Best for: Refresh rate upgrade
Pros
120 Hz refresh
USB-C 90W
IPS Black
Same RJ45 hub
Cons
$100 more
Only QHD (1440p)
Not 4K
7
ASUS ProArt PA278CV
Best for: Budget QHD USB-C
Pros
Only $329
USB-C 65W
QHD IPS
Adjustable stand
Cons
Only 1440p
60 Hz
No 4K
8
Gigabyte M27U
Best for: Gaming + productivity 4K
Pros
4K 144 Hz
USB-C 18W
SS IPS
Good value
Cons
Lower USB-C power
No RJ45
Gaming aesthetic
9
Dell U2722D
Best for: QHD value
Pros
QHD IPS
USB-C 90W
RJ45 hub
Dell reliability
Cons
Only 1440p
60 Hz
No IPS Black
10
Samsung M8
Best for: Smart monitor
Pros
4K
Tizen smart TV built-in
Wireless DeX
Includes webcam
Colorful design
Cons
USB-C only 65W
No RJ45
Weaker panel than Dell
Pricing Comparison
LG UltraFine 4K (24MD4KL)$699
ASUS ProArt PA279CV$549
LG C2 OLED 42"$999
BenQ PD2705U$699
Apple Studio Display$1599
Dell U2724DE$799
ASUS ProArt PA278CV$329
Gigabyte M27U$599
Dell U2722D$549
Samsung M8$699
Why Choose an Alternative
You want OLED contrast and 120 Hz the U2723QE lacks.
You want a Mac-native experience like the LG UltraFine or Apple Studio Display.
You want a cheaper 4K USB-C monitor like the ASUS ProArt PA279CV.
You need a higher refresh rate like the Dell U2724DE 120 Hz or Gigabyte M27U 144 Hz.
You want a smart monitor with built-in streaming like the Samsung M8.
FAQ
What is the best Mac alternative to the Dell U2723QE?
The LG UltraFine 4K ($699) or Apple Studio Display ($1599). Both pair natively with macOS and avoid scaling issues. The U2723QE remains the best value USB-C choice.
Which U2723QE alternative has 120 Hz?
The Dell U2724DE ($799) offers 120 Hz with USB-C 90W and RJ45, but is QHD not 4K. For 4K 120 Hz, the LG C2 OLED ($999) or Gigabyte M27U ($599) are the picks.
Is the LG C2 OLED a good U2723QE alternative?
For mixed use, yes. The OLED panel offers infinite contrast and 120 Hz for $200 more. For pure coding, the U2723QE wins on text clarity and USB-C docking — see our Dell U2723QE vs LG C2 OLED comparison.
What is the cheapest U2723QE alternative?
The ASUS ProArt PA278CV at $329 (QHD, USB-C 65W) for budget buyers. For 4K on a budget, the ASUS ProArt PA279CV at $549 saves $150 vs the Dell.
Which alternative is best for color-accurate design work?
The ASUS ProArt PA279CV ($549) and BenQ PD2705U ($699) both offer factory calibration and wide color gamut. The Apple Studio Display ($1599) is the premium pick for Mac designers.